Mr L Janicki v Arcform Limited — 2022

Case reference: 1600050/2021
Decision date: 15 February 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Venue: Remotely

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr L Janicki

Respondent

Arcform Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard remotely on 11 February 2022 before Tribunal Judge DS McLeese sitting alone. The written judgment records that the claimant, Mr L Janicki, was represented by himself and the respondent, Arcform Limited, was represented by its director, Mr Tudor.

The tribunal held that both the unfair dismissal claim and the wrongful dismissal claim were well founded and were upheld. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons beyond noting that oral reasons were given at the hearing, and it does not record any monetary award or other remedy.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	—
Wrongful dismissal	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.