Case 1600057/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D J Hill v Wendy Evans Contract Services and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600057/2019
- Decision date
- 22 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beard Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr D J Hill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment is procedural only. It identifies the parties as Mr D J Hill and respondents Wendy Evans Contract Services, Ms W Evans and Mr Berriman, heard at Cardiff before Employment Judge Beard on 20 April 2018. The judgment was dated 19 July 2019 and sent to the parties on 22 July 2019.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claim against the third respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability, dismissal, discrimination, wages, or breach of contract are set out in the extracted text for that claim.
The judgment also states that the claims against respondents 1 and 2 continued in a single respondent as the second respondent trading as the first respondent. No remedy, legal test, or further outcome is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claimant’s claim against the third respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive claim type is identified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.