Case 1600061/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark Jones v S J Bodyworx Limited DRAFT — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600061/2021
- Decision date
- 14 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mark Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,604.26. It also found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £370.86 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal further recorded that the claimant had not been given itemised pay statements. It also found that the respondent had not provided a written statement of initial particulars contrary to sections 1 and 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and awarded four weeks’ pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 in the gross sum of £2,966.88.
The hearing listed for 27 May 2021 was cancelled. The combined monetary awards recorded in the judgment total £6,942.00.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,604.26 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £3,604 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £370.86. | Upheld | — | £371 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to give the claimant itemised pay statements, but no separate monetary award is recorded for this finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found the claimant had not been given a written statement of initial particulars contrary to sections 1 and 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded four weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 in the gross sum of £2,966.88. | Upheld | — | £2,967 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,942
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.