Case 1600061/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Z Reay v MT & KM Cap (a partnership trading as “Morgan’s of Deeside”) — 2026
- Case reference
- 1600061/2026
- Decision date
- 16 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Z Reay
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant's complaint of victimisation was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. No remedy was awarded in relation to that complaint.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claims will proceed to a hearing on a date to be notified in due course. It does not identify those remaining claims or make findings on their merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The complaint of victimisation was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment states that remaining claims will proceed to a future hearing but does not identify or determine them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.