Case 1600062/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D E Jones (1) Ms E Jones (2) Mr J G Jones (3) Ms C Roberts (4) Mr K Thomas (5) Mr W Thompson (6) Ms S Webb (7) v Gwasanaeth Ysgolion William Mathias Cyf — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600062/2021
- Decision date
- 6 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D E Jones (1) Ms E Jones (2) Mr J G Jones (3) Ms C Roberts (4) Mr K Thomas (5) Mr W Thompson (6) Ms S Webb (7)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent case management judgment, not a merits decision. Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan recorded that the claims were stayed until 3 October 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the tribunal stayed the claims until 3 October 2022. The order further provided that unless any party applied by 4 pm on 3 October 2022 for the final hearing to be re-listed, the claims would be dismissed upon deemed withdrawal. No merits determination or monetary award was recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | By consent, the tribunal stayed the claims until 3 October 2022. The order further provided that unless any party applied by 4 pm on 3 October 2022 for the final hearing to be re-listed, the claims would be dismissed upon deemed withdrawal. No merits determination or monetary award was recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.