Case 1600066/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Thomas v BRT International Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600066/2020
- Decision date
- 13 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr A Thomas was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 23 August 2019. It held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment calculated as 2 years at £380 per year, producing an award of £760.
It also found that BRT International Ltd was in breach of contract because it did not give the claimant notice of termination or pay in lieu of notice. The tribunal awarded damages for that breach in the net sum of 12 weeks' net pay, assessed at £7,605.12.
In addition, the tribunal found a breach of regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It held that the respondent had not paid the claimant for 8 days of accrued but untaken holiday on termination, and ordered payment of £1,336.50.
The total amount payable was stated to be £9,701.62. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 23 August 2019 and was therefore entitled to a statutory redundancy payment calculated at 2 years x £380. | Upheld | — | £760 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to give notice of termination or make a payment in lieu, and awarded damages equivalent to 12 weeks' net pay. | Upheld | — | £7,605 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found a breach of regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 because 8 days' accrued but untaken holiday had not been paid on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,337 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,702
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £760
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,605
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.