Case 1600075/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wycherley v Crl Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600075/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date-
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wycherley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment in case 1600075/2020. The tribunal recorded that by letter dated 19 August 2020 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the tribunal order dated 6 March 2020, for not having been actively pursued, and for failing to make written representations or sufficient representations against strike out.
No representations were made, or no sufficient representations were made, and no hearing was requested. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s) in the extracted text; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 6 March 2020, lack of active pursuit, and failure to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.