Case 1600077/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Hawkins v The Chief Constable Of Dyfed Powys Police — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600077/2020
- Decision date
- 31 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Hawkins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 1600077/2020 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The decision is a short Rule 52 withdrawal judgment and does not set out any findings on liability, evidence, or remedy.
No monetary award was made, and the judgment contains no substantive reasons beyond the fact of withdrawal and dismissal of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The PDF does not set out reasons or further particulars of this claim type; the type is taken from the case listing category. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The PDF does not set out reasons or further particulars of this claim type; the type is taken from the case listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.