Case 1600082/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Driscoll v Run Afan Forest Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600082/2024
- Decision date
- 22 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- By Video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Driscoll
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R F Powell, sitting by video on 19 April 2024, found that the claimant's breach of contract claim was well founded and ordered the second respondent to pay damages in the net sum of £2,564.95. The claim of unlawful deductions from wages also succeeded in respect of unpaid holiday pay, unpaid wages and unpaid pension contributions, with compensation ordered in the net sum of £2,314.63.
The tribunal refused an application by the respondent to adjourn the hearing to obtain bank statements relevant to a dispute over £300 of unpaid wages. The judge noted that the issue had not been pleaded, raised when agreeing the issues at the outset, put in cross-examination, or mentioned in the respondent's oral witness evidence, and that an adjournment would have required further service of documents and additional witness evidence which could not be accommodated in the remaining hearing time.
In light of the second respondent's assertion that it was soon going into receivership, the judge concluded that granting the late application was neither proportionate nor in the interests of justice, observing that another hearing could have been avoided if the second respondent had made reasonable efforts to prepare its case in a timely manner.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the breach of contract claim well founded; second respondent ordered to pay damages in the net sum of £2,564.95. | Upheld | — | £2,565 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim well founded in respect of unpaid holiday pay, unpaid wages and unpaid pension contributions; net sum of £2,314.63 ordered. | Upheld | — | £2,315 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,880
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.