Case 1600084/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lachiri v Chief Constable of North Wales Police Dated: 22nd February 2021 — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600084/2019
- Decision date
- 21 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lachiri
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a hearing on 4 January 2021, the tribunal gave an oral judgment allowing some parts of the claimant's amendment application and dismissing others. It also concluded that six of the claimant's allegations should be made subject to a deposit order, with a total sum of £60. The claimant applied on 16 February 2021 for reconsideration of that deposit order, and Employment Judge R F Powell refused the application on 22 February 2021.
The judge held that the reconsideration application largely repeated the claimant's earlier account or expanded points that had not been made at the hearing. No error of law or failure to take account of a material consideration was identified in the original reasons, and the additional assertions had not been articulated at the 4 January 2021 hearing despite the claimant having had a lengthy opportunity to present his case. The judge also noted the public interest in the finality of litigation, referred to Redding v EMI Leisure Ltd, and concluded that there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This is a refusal of the claimant's application for reconsideration under Rule 70(1) of the 2013 Rules. The judgment concerns a £60 deposit order made after the oral judgment of 4 January 2021 and does not determine the substantive discrimination allegations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £60
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 70(1) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 72(1) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- interests of justice
- Redding v EMI Leisure Ltd (EAT/262/81)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.