Case 1600086/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Woodward v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600086/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vernon
- Venue
- Pontypridd
- Panel members
- Mrs M Humphreys, Mr R Mead
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Woodward
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the parties agreed to bear their own costs in claim number 1600086/2019. The Respondent also agreed to provide a reference for the Claimant on request, stating his dates of employment, role, team, and duties.
The Claimant withdrew the Claim by email dated 19 November 2019. The Tribunal ordered that the Claimant's claim be dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the judgment text and no substantive findings on the claims were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself records only that the Claimant withdrew the Claim and that the Claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself records only that the Claimant withdrew the Claim and that the Claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself records only that the Claimant withdrew the Claim and that the Claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself records only that the Claimant withdrew the Claim and that the Claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself records only that the Claimant withdrew the Claim and that the Claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.