Case 1600087/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Foden v Alpha Cycle Worx Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600087/2023
- Decision date
- 25 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Foden
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 12 January 2023. The respondent, Alpha Cycle Worx Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation), failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Brace determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the substance of the claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The judgment records an award of 371.42, and states that the respondent must pay that sum to the claimant.
The judgment does not split the award into separate components and does not record any additional findings beyond the unpaid holiday entitlement. The total amount payable recorded by the tribunal is 371.42.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Determined on the papers under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £671 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £671
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.