Case 1600088/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Healey v Nytram Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600088/2022
- Decision date
- 12 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Healey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 April 2023, the tribunal gave Mr R Healey an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for having not been actively pursued. The judgment text identifies the respondent as Nytram Group Limited and records that Employment Judge Jenkins Date signed the judgment on 3 May 2023, with the decision sent to the parties on 12 May 2023.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant failed to make written representations or request a hearing following the tribunal's letter dated 18 April 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.