Case 1600098/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Cheek v HD Pubs Investment Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600098/2022
- Decision date
- 24 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Cheek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms A Cheek, brought claims against HD Pubs Investment Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages and holiday pay due on termination. The respondent conceded those claims, and the tribunal recorded that they were well-founded and succeeded.
The tribunal also recorded that, when proceedings were begun, the respondent was in breach of its duty to give the claimant a written statement of the initial employment particulars. That point was also conceded. The judgment does not record a separate monetary award for that breach.
The parties agreed a settlement of the claims, under which the respondent was to pay £1,581.73 subject to the usual statutory deductions in full and final settlement of all claims before the tribunal and any awards the tribunal might otherwise have made. The judgment states that no award was made by the tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The respondent conceded that, when proceedings were begun, it was in breach of its duty to give the claimant a written statement of the initial employment particulars. The parties then settled all claims, and no award was made by the Tribunal. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,582
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.