Case 1600104/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E W Williams v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600104/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E W Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had previously made orders dated 25 April 2019 and 10 September 2020 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claims should not be struck out on the basis that they had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claims were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The specific pleaded discrimination allegation is not described in the judgment text, but the listing category identifies disability discrimination. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claims were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The specific wage deduction allegation is not described in the judgment text, but the listing category identifies unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.