Case 1600104/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Holmes v Home Office — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600104/2023
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Macdonald Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Holmes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments relating to the act said to have occurred on or around 2 February 2022 for want of jurisdiction.
It found that the remaining discrimination complaints had been presented within the time limit provided by s 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010. Those remaining complaints were therefore to proceed to a final hearing, with no findings on their merits recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint relating to the act on or around 2 February 2022 was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The remainder of the discrimination complaints were found to have been presented within the time limit under s 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 and were to proceed to a final hearing; the merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.