Case 1600106/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Beavan v Primo Amore Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600106/2023
- Decision date
- 1 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Beavan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R Brace Date dismissed the claims in case 1600106/2023 on 30 October 2023 after both the Claimant, Mr L Beavan, and the Respondent, Primo Amore Limited, failed to attend or be represented at the hearing. The judgment records that the tribunal considered the information on the file and made attempts to contact both parties by telephone on the morning of the hearing before disposing of the case under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
No findings were made on the substantive merits of the underlying disputes, and the judgment does not set out separate reasoning for each head of claim. The claims were therefore dismissed without any award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK listing; the judgment reasons do not identify the individual heads of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK listing; the judgment reasons do not identify the individual heads of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | This entry reflects the remaining listed matter, likely the written pay statement / contract of employment category; the judgment reasons do not separate it out. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.