Case 1600122/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Haste v Gin Ne Sais Quoi (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600122/2023
- Decision date
- 24 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss J Haste
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It found that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required at least two years' service to bring such a claim, and that Miss J Haste had been employed for less than two years.
Because the claimant was therefore not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, the tribunal struck it out. The reasons record that the claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but no acceptable reason was provided.
The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because section 108 ERA 1996 requires two years' service and the claimant had less than two years' service. The judgment says the claimant's other complaints were not affected, but they were not determined in this decision. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.