Case 1600133/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Jones v Quartzize Worktops Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600133/2022
- Decision date
- 3 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Howden-Evans sat alone in Cardiff on 2 August 2022. The judgment records that the Respondent could not make a counterclaim. The parties then agreed by consent that the Respondent owed the Claimant £623.16 gross for holiday pay and £1,091.20 gross for outstanding wages.
The total amount recorded as due to the Claimant was £1,714.36 gross. The judgment states that this sum was to be paid by the Respondent, with the Claimant responsible for any income tax or national insurance that might be due.
The judgment further provided that if the debt was not paid within 14 days, interest would accrue at 8% per annum on any unpaid amount. It also records that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseekers Allowance & Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply to the award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | By consent, the Respondent agreed it owed the Claimant £623.16 gross for holiday pay. | Settled | — | £623 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the Respondent agreed it owed the Claimant £1,091.20 gross for outstanding wages. | Settled | — | £1,091 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,714
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.