Case 1600134/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Jethro Dix v Impact Learning & Data Solutions Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 1600134/2018
- Decision date
- 12 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davies JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jethro Dix
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 1 August 2018, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 June 2018 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying substantive complaint and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim under rule 37 because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 June 2018 and had not actively pursued the claim. The reasons do not identify the substantive claims individually. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.