Case 1600140/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Cheese v Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600140/2023
- Decision date
- 23 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Cheese
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by consent, the claimant's unauthorised deduction from wages claim was well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £70.65 for that claim.
The tribunal also recorded that, by consent, the claimant's claim for unpaid accrued annual leave was well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £465.23 for that claim.
The claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim and wrongful dismissal claim were each found not well-founded and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment does not set out further reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the unauthorised deduction from wages claim was agreed to be well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the net sum of £70.65. | Upheld | — | £71 |
| Holiday pay | By consent, the unpaid accrued annual leave claim was agreed to be well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the net sum of £465.23. | Upheld | — | £465 |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records that the constructive unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment records that the wrongful dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £536
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.