Case 1600143/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Coleman v Edward Strivens-Coupe — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600143/2022
- Decision date
- 28 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Coleman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss J Coleman's claim. In a letter dated 27 July 2022, the tribunal gave her an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, because she had not complied with the tribunal's orders dated 6 and 18 July 2022 and did not attend the telephone preliminary hearing on 26 July 2022.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations why strike out should not be ordered, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim.
The judgment also states that the hearing listed for 26 to 28 October 2022 would not take place. No substantive determination of the underlying claim is recorded, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it records only that 'the claim is struck out' because the claimant did not comply with orders dated 6 and 18 July 2022, did not attend the telephone preliminary hearing on 26 July 2022, and did not actively pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.