Case 1600148/2023 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v - Mr P Soni (lay Representative) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600148/2023
- Decision date
- 25 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge McLeese, sitting alone, heard the case by video at Cardiff on 24 April 2023. The claimant’s claim for payment of debts as an employee of Flowerbags (UK) Ltd was dismissed as not well founded because the tribunal found that she was not an employee of the first respondent.
The holiday pay claim was withdrawn during the hearing. On the same employment-status finding, the tribunal held that the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment or payment in lieu of notice from the National Insurance Fund.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for payment of debts as an employee of the first respondent was found not well founded and dismissed; the tribunal held the claimant was not an employee. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was not an employee of the respondent company and was therefore not entitled to a redundancy payment or payment in lieu of notice from the National Insurance Fund. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn during the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.