Case 1600148/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Warren v A Quality Service Ltd (AQS) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1600148/2025
- Decision date
- 12 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore’s
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Warren
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 30 July 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr R Warren an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were non-compliance with Employment Judge Harfield's order of 1 May 2025, non-compliance with Employment Judge Moore's order of 20 June 2025, that the claim had not been actively pursued, and that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing of the claim.
Mr Warren did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 21 August 2025 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim types; it records a strike out of the claim as a whole after non-compliance with orders and failure to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.