Case 1600154/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Jenkins v Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board — 2025
- Case reference
- 1600154/2025
- Decision date
- 22 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Webb Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Jenkins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Cardiff hearing on 11 July 2025, Employment Judge N Webb decided the preliminary time-limit issue for Mrs J Jenkins's unfair dismissal claim against Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board. The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the unfair dismissal claim to have been presented within the period required by section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider it. The written record also states that the other claims in the ET1 were presented in a period that the tribunal thought was just and equitable, but it does not record any further substantive determination of those claims in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the unfair dismissal claim to have been presented within the s.111 ERA 1996 time limit, and dismissed the claim because it did not have jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.