Case 1600155/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Steve Reeves v Parkdean Resorts UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600155/2023
- Decision date
- 4 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge HV Dieu
- Venue
- Cardiff Magistrates Court
- Panel members
- Mr Stephenson OBE, Mr Fryer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Steve Reeves
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record states that the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The written record also states that the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for detriment arising out of protected information disclosure under section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons were not provided in this record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded as a claim for automatic unfair dismissal pursuant to s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Recorded as a claim for detriment arising out of protected information disclosure pursuant to s.43B Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.43B Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.