Case 1600159/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Collins v Mr R Marshall Mr N Anderson Mr R Dyson Mr P Gay (all Trustees of Caerphilly Golf Club, an unincorporated association) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600159/2021
- Decision date
- 27 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Collins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Cardiff by CVP before Employment Judge C Sharp sitting alone on 24 September 2021. The written judgment records that, by consent, the correct name of the respondent was Mr R Marshall, Mr N Anderson, Mr R Dyson, and Mr P Gay, all trustees of Caerphilly Golf Club, an unincorporated association.
The only substantive claim determined in the written record was the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal found that claim was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons are provided unless requested under the tribunal rules. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written record says reasons were given orally at the hearing and are not set out in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.