Case 1600176/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Atherton Mrs Z Utley Mr W A Williams v The Pilot Boat Inn Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600176/2019
- Decision date
- 21 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Atherton Mrs Z Utley Mr W A Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment covers case numbers 1600176/2019, 1600179/2019 and 1600181/2019. The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The extracted text does not identify the substantive causes of action, make any findings on liability, or record any monetary award. The judgment is dated 20 April 2020 and was sent to the parties on 21 April 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Case 1600176/2019; the judgment states the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying claim type is not identified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Case 1600179/2019; the judgment states the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying claim type is not identified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Case 1600181/2019; the judgment states the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying claim type is not identified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.