Case 1600180/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ian Sheffield v Gower Gas and Oil (Heating Services) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600180/2021
- Decision date
- 15 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans Tribunal
- Panel members
- A Fine, G Howells
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ian Sheffield
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cardiff by CVP on 10 February 2022 before Employment Judge R Evans, sitting with tribunal members A Fine and G Howells. The claimant was represented by counsel and the respondent by a legal representative.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for whistleblowing, unfair dismissal and holiday pay were dismissed following the claimant having withdrawn them. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability, because the claims were not determined on their merits.
The written record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Dismissed following the Claimant having withdrawn the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following the Claimant having withdrawn the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following the Claimant having withdrawn the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.