Case 1600195/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Rogers v Thirsty Horses Solution Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600195/2024
- Decision date
- 24 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Rogers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 15 January 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant damages for breach of contract comprising unpaid employer pension contributions of £318.97 and unpaid employee pension contributions of £425.16, totalling £744.03. The hearing listed for 29 April 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 determination following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. Award comprises unpaid employer pension contributions of £318.97 and unpaid employee pension contributions of £425.16. The judgment characterises the award as damages for breach of contract; the gov.uk listing categorised the matter as unlawful deduction from wages, but the tribunal's own words are followed here. | Upheld | — | £744 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £744
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.