Case 1600203/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Roppanto v Eastibake Foods Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600203/2021
- Decision date
- 19 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Roppanto
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr G Roppanto's claim against Eastibake Foods Ltd. The reason given was that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 14 July 2021 and had not actively pursued the case.
Before striking out, the Tribunal sent a letter dated 18 October 2021 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records no response or material submitted in answer to that opportunity.
No substantive findings on liability, discrimination, dismissal, or remedy were made. The judgment is limited to the procedural strike-out decision and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. The claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 14 July 2021 and had not actively pursued the claim, after a letter dated 18 October 2021 gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.