Case 1600206/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Thomas v J & E Page (Merthyr) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600206/2021
- Decision date
- 14 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mrs J Thomas's claim for unfair dismissal was well founded. The written judgment records only the outcome and remedy, because reasons were given orally at the hearing and are not included in the written record.
The tribunal awarded £8,000.21 as a compensatory award. That sum was made up of £7,600.21 for loss of earnings and £400 for loss of statutory rights. No basic award was made because the claimant had received redundancy pay.
The judgment also states that the recoupment provisions apply. The tribunal sat with Employment Judge C Sharp alone at Cardiff by CVP on 12 October 2021, and the written record was sent to the parties on 14 October 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that no basic award was made because the claimant had received redundancy pay. The written record says reasons were given orally at the hearing and are not set out in the written judgment. | Upheld | — | £8,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,000
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £8,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.