Case 1600210/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M S Djoudi v Mach Recruitment Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600210/2022
- Decision date
- 22 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M S Djoudi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that, in breach of Section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Respondent made an unlawful deduction from the Claimant's wages.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £1,273.89 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. The judgment states that the Claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on that sum.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons were not provided unless requested under the Tribunal Rules.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records breach of Section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and orders payment of the gross sum deducted. Reasons were given orally and written reasons are not included in the supplied text. | Upheld | — | £1,274 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,274
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.