Case 1600224/2018 · Employment Tribunal

MS L EVANS (FRIEND) FOR THE v Respondent — 2019

Case reference: 1600224/2018
Decision date: 5 April 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Panel members: Mrs J Kiely, Mrs C Williams

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

MS L EVANS (FRIEND) FOR THE

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal at Haverfordwest heard the case on 18 and 19 March 2019 before Employment Judge N W Beard with Mrs J Kiely and Mrs C Williams as members. Mr G J Brown brought claims against Cwtch St Davids Limited for sex discrimination, unlawful deduction from wages, and breach of contract.

The judgment states that the sex discrimination claim under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and was dismissed. The unlawful deduction from wages claim under sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was also found not well founded and dismissed.

The breach of contract claim brought under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order (England & Wales) 1994 was likewise found not well founded and dismissed. The extract records no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Sex discrimination	Recorded from the judgment.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Recorded from the judgment.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	Recorded from the judgment.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.