Case 1600233/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Thomas v Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600233/2019
- Decision date
- 12 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Thomas brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council. The tribunal heard the case at Cardiff on 11 October 2019 before Employment Judge S Jenkins, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr J French-Williams.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the required statutory time limits under sections 111(2)(a) and (b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claim was not brought within the required time limits under sections 111(2)(a) and (b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 111(2)(a) and (b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.