Case 1600233/2021 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v Mr J Heath, Solicitor, Make UK — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600233/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing by telephone on 27 October 2021 before Employment Judge Lloyd. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by Mr J Heath, solicitor, for Make UK.
The tribunal struck out all of the claimant's claims under rules 47 and 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The reasons recorded were that the claimant had not attended or been represented, had produced no evidence to support the claims, had failed to comply with or respond to the strike-out warning dated 22 October 2021, had not complied with tribunal rules and orders, and had not actively pursued the claim. The judgment records that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success.
The proceedings were dismissed in their entirety. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action; it states that all of the claimant's claims were struck out and dismissed in their entirety. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 47
- Rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.