Case 1600238/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Emma Williams v Group 12 Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1600238/2026
- Decision date
- 7 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Emma Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmma Williams presented her claim against Group 12 Limited in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 7 July 2026. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Ms Williams's wages and ordered payment of £2,291.67 gross. It also found that she had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £528.69 in damages, and that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement and must pay £634.62. The total award was £3,454.98, with Ms Williams responsible for any income tax or statutory deductions due. The hearing listed for 11 August 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £2,292 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £529 |
| Holiday pay | Award made for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £635 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,455
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.