Case 1600243/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Jones v First Call Travel Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600243/2021
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningProceeding under Rule 21, Employment Judge Harfield Date entered judgment on the monetary claims in favour of Mr G Jones against First Call Travel Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £3,697.20 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,416.00 in damages. It further held that holiday entitlement had not been paid, ordering £708.00, and that the respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements, ordering £702.00.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions and ordered four weeks' pay of £1,416.00. The unfair dismissal claim was not decided in this judgment; it was left to be determined at a hearing to be notified in due course.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,697.20. | Upheld | — | £3,697 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,416.00. | Upheld | — | £1,416 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £708.00. | Upheld | — | £708 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements and ordered £702.00. | Upheld | — | £702 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions and ordered four weeks' pay of £1,416.00. | Upheld | — | £1,416 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,939
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.