Mr J Morgan v The Baglan Hotel — 2023

Case reference: 1600254/2022
Decision date: 7 February 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge S Moore Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Morgan

Respondent

The Baglan Hotel

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 5 January 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because the Tribunal had not been informed that an application had been made to have the respondent company restored to the Register of Companies. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no determination of the substantive merits and no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the substantive claim(s). The Tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not make representations, or sufficient representations, after a 5 January 2023 letter asking why the claim should not be struck out where the claimant had not informed the Tribunal that he had applied to have the respondent company restored to the Register of Companies.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.