Case 1600255/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sarah Davies v Bar & Catering Supplies Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600255/2019
- Decision date
- 8 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sarah Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace determined the case on 5 July 2019 in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent. The judgment states that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to enable a proper determination to be made, and the decision was made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim. The judgment records an award of £4,131.61 in respect of that claim.
The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. No separate split of the award is given in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that, because no ET3 response form was filed and sufficient material was available, the tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction of wages claim and awarded £4,131.61. | Upheld | — | £4,132 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,132
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal's Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.