Case 1600269/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrew Jones v [1] Excel Civil Enforcement Limited [2] High Court Enforcement Group — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600269/2022
- Decision date
- 30 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Tribunal Member Horne, Tribunal Member Humphries
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andrew Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Andrew Jones brought claims against Excel Civil Enforcement Limited and High Court Enforcement Group, heard at Cardiff Employment Tribunal by video on 21 to 23 March 2023 before Employment Judge H J Randall with Tribunal Members Horne and Humphries. The written judgment records that the claim for detriment for making a protected disclosure was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal also recorded that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed. The judgment does not set out written reasons for either outcome, stating that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records this claim as 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.