Case 1600271/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Procter v Pembrokeshire County Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600271/2019
- Decision date
- 8 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Procter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent. Employment Judge Howden-Evans stated that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The only claim expressly upheld was breach of contract. The judgment records that the claimant, Mrs A Procter, succeeded in that claim and that the amount awarded was £38,501. No other claim types are identified in the extracted judgment.
The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The judgment does not break the award down further, and it records £38,501 as the amount upheld.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that, in the absence of an ET3 response form and under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, the claimant's breach of contract claim was upheld for £38,501. | Upheld | — | £38,501 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £38,501
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.