Case 1600273/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Fuller v Satt Singh and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600273/2024
- Decision date
- 6 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Dated
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Fuller
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the responses of both Respondents. It had written to the Respondents on 02 October 2024 giving them an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about possible strike out because they had not complied with an order dated 23 September 2024 and the response had not been actively pursued.
The Respondents failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal stated that the Respondents would still be entitled to notice of hearings and decisions, but could participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the Respondents' responses; it does not determine the merits or remedy for this claim. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the Respondents' responses; it does not determine the merits or remedy for this claim. | Other | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the Respondents' responses; it does not determine the merits or remedy for this claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.