Case 1600276/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C J Driscoll v Sofa World Wales Merthyr Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600276/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Macdonald Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C J Driscoll
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cardiff Employment Tribunal on 25 July 2022 before Employment Judge E Macdonald. The Claimant, Mr C J Driscoll, appeared in person and the Respondent, Sofa World Wales Merthyr Ltd, was represented by Mr P Reynolds, the company director.
The tribunal held that the Claimant's claims for breach of contract, including notice pay, unpaid wages, including overtime, and holiday pay were not well-founded. All of those claims were dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
No monetary award was made because all claims were dismissed. The judgment does not record any split of remedies between claims and does not identify any separate findings beyond the dismissal of the listed contract and wage claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Included the Claimant's claim for notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Included the Claimant's claim for unpaid wages, including overtime. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.