Case 1600277/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Thomas v Bellavista Nursing Home Wales Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1600277/2025
- Decision date
- 29 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
- Venue
- Wrexham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 4 August 2025, Employment Judge Brace made orders and directions requiring the claimant to take prescribed steps within a timetable, and the minutes recorded a strike out warning and an explanation of the consequences of non-compliance. At the hearing on 27 August 2025, the claimant did not attend and her non-attendance was not explained or excused.
Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan dismissed the claims in the interests of justice because the claimant had failed to pursue them actively and had breached the orders and directions. The judgment records no substantive determination of the merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed after the claimant failed to comply with the 4 August 2025 orders and directions and did not attend the 27 August 2025 hearing; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed after the claimant failed to comply with the 4 August 2025 orders and directions and did not attend the 27 August 2025 hearing; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.