Case 1600283/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Smith v Offshore Wind Power Marine Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600283/2022
- Decision date
- 5 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, and wrongful dismissal. The judgment records that those claims all failed and were dismissed.
The claimant succeeded only on his separate claim for payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £69.90, pursuant to regulation 15(2) of the Merchant Shipping (Maritime Labour Convention) (Hours of Work) Regulations 2018.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim was for payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday and succeeded in the gross sum of £69.90 under regulation 15(2) of the Merchant Shipping (Maritime Labour Convention) (Hours of Work) Regulations 2018. | Upheld | — | £70 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £70
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.