Case 1600285/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C. Cole v Mr. N. Ismael trading as Honey Pots — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600285/2019
- Decision date
- 9 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C. Cole
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ismael bought the business from Mrs Meade on 12 November 2018. Mrs Cole had worked there for 10 years, continued on a five-day week after the sale, and had nine days' accrued holiday outstanding. The tribunal found her unwritten terms transferred to Mr Ismael, including a gross weekly wage of £284.54, a daily rate of £56.91, and an entitlement to 28 days' annual leave in a leave year running from 1 April to 31 March.
The tribunal accepted the transcript and recording of the 8 December 2018 conversation. It found that Mr Ismael told Mrs Cole she was to reduce from five days to four days a week, with the possibility of two or three days in a later quiet period, and that if she was not happy she should 'go' and not come back. It held that this amounted to a dismissal because she would not accept a forced variation of her contractual hours, and that there had been no prior warning, no fair consultative procedure, and no definite alternative contractual terms offered.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded and the basic award was assessed by reference to Mrs Cole's age of 47, 10 years' continuous employment, and gross weekly pay of £284.54, producing £3,699.02. The breach of contract claim for notice succeeded on the basis of 10 weeks' statutory minimum notice, producing £2,845.40. By concession, the tribunal also awarded £512.19 for nine days' accrued but untaken holiday, £58.73 for unauthorised deductions from wages, and £569.08 for failure to provide written particulars of employment. The claimant did not seek a compensatory award, and the total payable was £7,684.42 subject to statutory deductions where indicated.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award only; the claimant did not seek a compensatory award. The tribunal found she was dismissed on 8 December 2018 when she refused a forced reduction in contractual hours. | Upheld | — | £3,699 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for failure to give the 10 weeks' notice the tribunal said was due; calculated at the gross weekly wage of £284.54. | Upheld | — | £2,845 |
| Holiday pay | By concession of the respondent; nine days' accrued but untaken holiday at a daily gross rate of £56.91, subject to statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £512 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By concession of the respondent; gross sum subject to statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £59 |
| Other | Failure to provide written particulars of employment; the tribunal ordered two weeks' wages. | Upheld | — | £569 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,684
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,699
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.