Case 1600285/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dunn v Regis Fuel Logistics (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1600285/2025
- Decision date
- 28 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dunn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 28 October 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim because it appeared that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but did not reply.
The Tribunal was satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied. It also considered that striking out the claim would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment is a short Rule 38 strike-out decision and does not set out underlying factual allegations beyond the claim being struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.