Case 1600291/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S. Moss v Isringhausen GB Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600291/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S. Moss
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Wrexham on 3 December 2019, Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan held that Mr S. Moss was not a disabled person at the material time within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010. On that basis, the claimant's disability discrimination claims were dismissed.
The judgment was limited to the disability issue and expressly stated that the dismissal did not affect the claimant's unfair and wrongful dismissal claims. No remedy was awarded in this decision, and no further factual findings on those other claims were made in the written record provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person at the material time within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010; the disability discrimination claims were dismissed. The judgment stated this did not affect his unfair and wrongful dismissal claims, which were not determined in this decision. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.