Case 1600297/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Wall v Mon Motors Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600297/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Wall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Mr Wall's unfair dismissal claim because it had not been presented within the applicable time limit. It found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, so the limitation point was fatal to the claim.
The claimant's discrimination claim was also rejected on limitation grounds. The tribunal found that it was not within the relevant time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so that claim was dismissed as well.
The extracted judgment text does not identify the protected characteristic relied on for the discrimination claim, and it records that the reasons were given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons to follow unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not presented in time, although it had been reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The extracted judgment text refers only to a 'claim for discrimination' and does not identify the protected characteristic. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.